What a 52.6 PMI Really Means — and Why Labor Flexibility Matters More Than Ever

In January, the Institute for Supply Management’s Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) registered 52.6%, well above consensus expectations of 48.5% and the highest reading since 2022. At face value, the reading signals a return to expansion for U.S. manufacturing after a prolonged contraction.

‍

For operations leaders, however, the headline number is less important than what it reveals about the “new normal.” This isn’t just a return to growth. It is a transition from demand scarcity to demand variability. Understanding that distinction is critical, because it changes how facilities must plan, staff, and execute.

‍

‍

Interpreting the PMI in Operational Terms

The PMI is a diffusion index based on survey responses across key dimensions of manufacturing activity, including new orders, production, employment, supplier deliveries, and inventories. When the index rises as sharply as it did in January, it typically reflects movement across multiple components rather than improvement in a single area.

‍

In operational terms, this pattern suggests the following:

• New order inflows are gaining momentum: Customers are placing more work with suppliers, often in anticipation of broader demand or inventory replenishment.
• Production activity is rising: Facilities that had been operating below capacity are moving closer to full utilization.
• Employment conditions are stabilizing or improving: A rising employment subindex suggests firms are becoming more willing to add labor or restore previously reduced shifts.
• Supplier delivery times are lengthening: While slower deliveries are often viewed as a constraint, in this context they more likely reflect higher order volumes and capacity pressure across supply chains.

‍

Taken together, these shifts indicate broad-based improvement across manufacturing activity.

‍

‍

What This Environment Creates for Operations

As orders return, the system does not simply run “faster.” It becomes more uneven.

‍

Work concentrates in specific lines, shifts, or facilities rather than distributing neatly across the operation. Some weeks feel light, others feel compressed. Priorities change as customers pull forward or delay shipments to navigate their own supply chain constraints.

‍

For leaders, the main burden is not managing capacity in the abstract. It is managing alignment in real time.

‍

Production schedules that looked reasonable on Monday can become unrealistic by Wednesday. Supervisors spend more time adjusting and sequencing work than improving processes. This creates The Productivity Trap: output rises, but cost per unit worsens because supervisors spend more time firefighting than improving flow or throughput. Coverage problems are less about total headcount and more about having the right skills in the right place at the right moment.

‍

Throughput may look strong in aggregate, yet supervisors still experience constant friction: last-minute swaps, firefighting, and workarounds that never fully disappear. The operation is growing, but it is not “settled.”

‍

‍

Why Fixed Labor Models Struggle in This Phase

When demand is rising but uneven, fixed staffing creates a predictable and costly tradeoff. This is where the structural mismatch between a rigid labor model and a variable operating environment becomes economically visible.

‍

The Economic Cost of "The Gap"

In a fixed model, facilities must staff to a target volume. If they staff for the peak, labor effectiveness collapses during inevitable lulls. If they staff for the average, they are pushed into the Overtime Trap, where higher wages, quality issues, safety risks, and burnout quietly erode margins.

‍

The Binary Risk of Hiring

Fixed hiring forces binary decisions in a world that is actually incremental and fluid. Leaders either commit to permanent cost too early, risking over-leverage if growth plateaus, or wait too long and pay the price in missed orders, expedited shipping, and execution strain that damages customer relationships.

‍

The core problem is that fixed labor treats variability as an error to be absorbed rather than a market reality to be designed around. In early expansion, variability is not the exception. It is the defining feature of recovery.

‍

‍

Using Flexible Labor to Navigate Uneven Recovery

Veryable's on-demand labor marketplace provides shift-level capacity that moves with real work, giving operations a third lever beyond overtime or permanent hiring. Instead of locking in headcount based on imperfect forecasts, facilities can add qualified Operators precisely where and when the operation actually needs them.

‍

This creates a "Core + Flex" operating model. Sites maintain a stable core workforce for critical roles, institutional knowledge, and continuity, then use Veryable to fill incremental gaps as demand materializes across lines, shifts, and skill sets. Capacity scales to the work rather than the other way around.

‍

In practice, this delivers two outcomes that matter most during early expansion:

‍

Scalability without chaos

When orders accelerate or mix shifts unexpectedly, additional Operators can be deployed within hours or days instead of waiting through traditional hiring cycles or navigating staffing agency contracts and minimums. That reduces last-minute scrambling and preserves schedule integrity. At the same time, using supplemental labor for surges reduces structural reliance on overtime, protecting safety performance, quality outcomes, and retention of the core workforce during high-tempo periods.

‍

Stable unit economics with repeatable execution

Because labor aligns to actual workload rather than projected averages, facilities maintain a more consistent unit cost through peaks and valleys instead of watching margins erode when volume swings against a fixed payroll. Over time, facilities can also build a curated On-Demand Labor Pool of familiar, rated Operators who already understand the facility’s safety protocols and workflows, minimizing ramp time when activity accelerates.

‍

Taken together, this model provides a controlled way to absorb nonlinear growth without over-staffing in advance or burning out the core workforce. It preserves service levels, keeps costs aligned to real work, and turns labor from a planning constraint into an execution capability.

‍

‍

Looking Ahead

In a recovery defined by variability, organizations that rely on slow, traditional hiring cycles effectively surrender the early phases of every growth step. By the time fixed labor catches up, more agile competitors are already executing, absorbing demand, and strengthening customer relationships that are hard to win back.

‍

Treating labor flexibility as a core operational capability changes that dynamic. Instead of viewing headcount as a rigid constraint, leaders can deploy capacity as a tactical advantage, matching labor to real work the moment it appears. In a fast-moving market, “wait and see” staffing is a strategic liability.

‍

The companies that win will be those that can scale each day to the precise level of support required, protect margins through volatility, and capture realized demand without unnecessary fixed cost exposure.

‍

Getting Started

Contact us to learn more about how our on-demand labor platform works, or create your free business profile today to start building your labor pool.

‍

‍

Stay Ahead of the Curve

U.S. Manufacturing Today features conversations with manufacturing leaders, operators, and industry voices focused on the realities shaping American production. Hosted by Matt Horine, Head of Reindustrialization at Veryable, the podcast connects workforce challenges, execution, technology adoption, and policy context to what leaders face inside facilities each day.

‍

The show focuses on real manufacturing experience rather than headlines or theory, offering practical perspective on how others are navigating change across the industry.

‍

Listen to U.S. Manufacturing Today