How On-Demand Labor Keeps January Returns From Disrupting Operations

January is when returns stop being something you plan for and start being something you deal with every day.

‍

Returned inventory is already coming across receiving docks and filling staging areas. Inspection and disposition queues start to build, and space that supported outbound in December is now taken up by returns waiting to be worked. At this point, the issue isn’t how many returns are coming. It’s whether the operation can process them fast enough to avoid disrupting outbound flow, inventory availability, and service commitments.

‍

How returns are handled in January shows up quickly outside the building. When processing slows, refunds back up, replacement orders slip, and customer service volume rises. What’s happening on the floor turns into a customer problem faster than most teams expect.

‍

At the same time, return volume changes day to day, the work required per unit isn’t consistent, and available labor capacity is usually lower than it was a few weeks earlier. This is where fixed labor models break down.

‍

‍

Why Returns Behave Differently Once January Is Underway

Labor planning is typically calibrated around outbound work. Even with variability, outbound volume follows recognizable patterns, throughput is relatively consistent, and tasks repeat predictably from shift to shift. Returns don’t behave that way.

‍

Volume remains uneven

Returns spike after Christmas and then move unpredictably. Daily swings are driven by customer behavior, carrier timing, and retailer policies. Labor decisions made several days in advance often don’t match what actually arrives. When volume outpaces processing capacity, refunds fall behind almost immediately.

‍

Work content changes constantly

One shift may deal mostly with unopened product that moves quickly. The next may include a higher share of damaged or used items that need inspection, testing, cleaning, or repackaging. Cycle time per unit varies enough that planning labor off averages stops being useful. That makes it harder to know when inventory will be available to resell or replace.

‍

Capacity tightens while variability stays high

Outbound volume drops, peak labor rolls off, and overtime is pulled back. Core teams are coming off long peak hours. Available capacity shrinks while returns remain unpredictable. That combination is what causes returns to disrupt execution instead of moving through the building.

‍

‍

Where The Breakdown Shows Up First

When returns start falling behind, the impact shows up fast and spreads.

‍

Returned inventory piles up in staging areas and on docks, reducing usable floor space. Refund timelines extend, driving customer service calls and escalations. Sellable inventory stays tied up instead of going back into stock, delaying replacement shipments and reorders. Congestion slows inbound and outbound flow. Overtime gets added later to recover lost ground, which only increases cost and error rates.

‍

By the time customers feel the impact, the operation is already behind.

‍

‍

What On-Demand Labor Actually Changes

Returns require labor that can respond to what’s happening on the floor, not just what was scheduled in advance. That’s where on-demand labor differs from fixed labor.

‍

Processing capacity can be added quickly

With Veryable, operators can be brought in as soon as the next morning to work defined returns tasks like sorting, inspection, relabeling, or repackaging. This increases throughput immediately.

‍

Work can be assigned based on complexity

Veryable allows teams to post returns work at the task level and select operators based on experience and past performance. That makes it possible to separate returns workflows by complexity:

• Operators with higher ratings or prior experience are assigned to inspection, testing, and quality-sensitive tasks
• Unfamiliar or less experienced operators are assigned to sorting, labeling, staging, and material movement

Because operators are brought in for specific tasks rather than general shifts, teams can protect constrained steps and keep simpler work moving in parallel. And as the mix of returns changes day to day, assignments can be adjusted without reworking schedules or overloading the core team.

‍

Core teams stay focused

On-demand operators take on the work that changes day to day so full-time employees aren’t constantly pulled between areas or pushed into extended hours. Keeping core teams in their primary roles preserves inspection standards, reduces rework, and limits fatigue during sustained returns pressure.

‍

‍

How Operations Leaders Actually Use On-Demand Labor in January

In January, on-demand labor is used when returns volume or work mix exceeds what the scheduled team can clear without creating carryover. Additional operators are brought in to prevent queues from forming or to work down backlogs that are already slowing inspection, relabeling, or disposition.

‍

Capacity is applied where work begins to accumulate, not spread evenly across the building. If inspection starts to lag, labor is added there. If disposition or relabeling becomes the constraint, effort shifts to those steps. The objective is to restore flow at the point of constraint, not to increase overall headcount.

‍

As returns volume fluctuates, added capacity changes with it. More operators are used on heavier days, fewer on lighter days. And when once returns slow, extra capacity is reduced just as quickly.

‍

‍

Why Outsourcing Returns Is Increasingly Constraining

Many companies outsourced returns to avoid carrying internal capacity for work that fluctuates throughout the year. For much of the year, that tradeoff works.

‍

January exposes the limits.

‍

During the returns surge, outsourced models face the same volatility as in-house operations, but with fewer options to respond. Inventory is further removed from day-to-day control, and processing priorities are constrained by the provider’s workflows and capacity. When volume spikes, response time lags.

‍

Visibility into where returns are stuck declines. Refund timelines extend. Sellable inventory remains unavailable longer than expected. Space and service issues show up downstream, even though the work itself is technically off-site.

‍

When returns require daily adjustment and prioritization, outsourced models often can’t keep pace.

‍

‍

Why Doing Nothing Is the Riskiest Option

Once returns fall behind, the window to recover starts closing.

‍

Refund timelines stretch almost immediately. Sellable inventory stays trapped in staging instead of reentering stock. Floor space tightens, and congestion begins to affect inbound and outbound flow. By the time teams react, the only remaining options are overtime and disruption.

‍

Waiting doesn’t make returns easier to manage. It allows backlogs to grow and forces more expensive corrections later.

‍

‍

The Bottom Line

By January, returns are already consuming space, labor, and attention on the floor. When they slip behind, refunds slow immediately, sellable inventory stays tied up, and customer experience deteriorates while teams are still stabilizing after peak.

‍

Veryable’s on-demand labor model allows operations teams to add capacity exactly where flow is breaking down and pull it back just as quickly once returns are cleared. That ability to intervene in real time at the task level doesn’t exist in fixed labor models.

‍

At this point in the season, waiting only lets the problem grow. Veryable gives operations teams a way to act now, keep returns moving, and prevent January issues from cascading.